Total recall

Total recall

THE BATTLE CONTINUES: A sign in the front yard of Southdowns resident Alex St. Amant encourages passers-by who live in District 12 to stop and sign a petition to recall Metro Councilman Mickey Skyring.

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Metro Councilman Mickey Skyring says he’s not running for re-election. Assuming he stands by that statement, his term will end in December. But that’s not soon enough for Alex St. Amant.

“He can do more damage while he’s still there,” St. Amant says. “The shorter time [in office], the better.”

St. Amant, an attorney who lives on Hyacinth Avenue, is leading an effort to recall Skyring. The effort officially began when he filed the necessary paperwork with the Secretary of State’s office on Oct. 29, when the debate over the planned Rouzan development was raging.

St. Amant and his supporters have 180 days from that date to collect signatures from one-third of District 12’s 22,631 registered voters. If the registrar of voters certifies the signatures, the governor would call for a new election.

He won’t divulge how many signatures he’s collected, but St. Amant says between 75% and 90% of the people he’s spoken with say they support the effort. Some of those people, including some who do business with city-parish government, are afraid to sign on, he says. Still, the momentum is building, and he thinks there’s a chance to succeed.

St. Amant, a board member of the Southside Civic Association, has been a leading opponent of Rouzan and also represents a pair of Ford property landowners who argue the zoning change was illegal. He and other recall supporters say Skyring promised to support keeping the former Ford property between Pollard Estates and Southdowns zoned A1 residential, then backed out on that promise by voting to change the zoning to “traditional neighborhood development.” The new zoning allows for commercial elements and much higher residential density.

Skyring’s opponents also say he refused to return their phone calls and is generally not responsive enough to his constituents. A flyer St. Amant sent to the district’s voters is headlined “Remember Rouzan” and urges the reader to “Show Mickey and our next councilman that actions have consequences!”

“The main purpose of the recall is to make a statement,” says Katherine Surek, a recall supporter who lives in Woodchase. “[The Rouzan vote] is a blatant example of Mickey doing what he thinks would be nice, not what his constituents think and want.”

Advertisement | Advertising

Surek doesn’t oppose development of the Ford property and expects developer Tommy Spinosa will “do a good job.” But she echoes many of her neighbors’ fears that a dense TND will create additional traffic and drainage problems in an area already struggling with those issues.

Surek, who voted for Skyring, is well aware of the councilman’s plan to retire. But she wants to set a precedent for whoever comes next that an elected official should follow the wishes of his constituents, regardless of his or her own views. And the majority of his constituents, she believes, wanted him to vote “no” on the rezoning.

Not every recall supporter is primarily motivated by the Rouzan issue. Patty Herke, who lives in Magnolia Woods, is upset over Skyring’s support for the Green Light Plan project that would widen Staring Lane, causing a number of elderly residents to lose their homes, she says. Herke says Skyring never met with the constituents who would be most affected by the project.

Recall supporter and University Hills resident Bob Benedict says he’s inclined to agree with people who are concerned about Rouzan. But his main complaint is that the A1 zoning code is often not adhered to in his area, saying the last straw was seeing two houses near his home being used as rental properties.

“When Mickey was up for election, he promised he’d be our advocate,” Benedict says. “That was about the last time we’ve seen him. We elect a councilman to represent us and do a job, not what he wants to do.”

When asked about the Ford property by Business Report in 2004, before his election, Skyring said he’d like to see it become a park, but allowed that was highly unlikely. The brief story presents keeping the residential zoning as his second choice, but does not indicate an explicit promise to always support A1 zoning.

Skyring recently said his personal preference would have been to keep it a farm, saying the sheep always put a smile on his face. But he was convinced Spinosa, who also developed CitiPlace on Corporate Boulevard and Perkins Rowe at Bluebonnet Boulevard and Perkins Road, could build “a better mouse trap” than an A1 development of cookie-cutter homes that might otherwise be built on the site.

“I’m as proud of that vote [for Rouzan] as I can be,” he says.

Skyring is convinced that Rouzan will eventually be embraced by the public, much like the once-controversial Baton Rouge Beach off Stanford Avenue.

He readily admits that he’s bad about returning phone calls, and says when the Rouzan debate was at its height, the steady stream of often-irate phone calls was simply too much to deal with. But he acknowledged answering all of the e-mails he received on the subject.

“I’m somewhat surprised,” Skyring says of the recall effort, which continues even though his time in office is nearly over. “They have every right to do that.”


Comments

Posted by Fred on March 25, 2008 at 12:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)

As a long time Southdowns resident, I support Mickey Skyring and his stance against the SCCA's Fear and Smear Campaign of Rouzan.

As a SCCA member I think a Recall Alex St. Amant Campaign would better serve the neighborhood.

Posted by mdavis03 on April 28, 2008 at 4:30 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Fred -- you're a dolt!

Posted by blue_ink_pin on April 28, 2008 at 4:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I drive by that sign everyday and everyday I shake my head at how utterly ridiculous it is. My fellow Southdowns residents committing themselves to three months of signatures because they don't agree with a new type of subdivision. My fellow Southdowns residents acting as if they are the voice of all Southdowns residents. The sole reason I am glad that the recall did not warrant enough support is because my fellow residents decided to make a trivial situation parallel the apocolypse. Too funny.

Posted by Philip on April 30, 2008 at 9:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Mickey Skyrihg is the winner in this fiasco, and probably can't wait until his term ends. I can't imagine why anyone would want to be the councilman for this neighborhood, which is obsessed with its own importance and invokes the same power-play everytime someone wants to operate a business nearby. Prior to the Rouzan project, the previous casualty was the owner of the property on Lee Drive and Perkins Road who wanted to build a condo project but the Southdowners wanted another ubiquitous A-1 residence (probably the only classification they can spell). Apparently they have no concern about the economic hardship they cause a landowner. If only they knew what a laughing stock they are to the rest of the community.

Post a comment

(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Story Extras

Poll

When will LSU lose its first football game this season?

See Results | Archives



Click Here for Great Deals